Saturday, March 17, 2007

Getting back to basics has a price

With the Spring election just over three weeks away, I expected to be inundated with political ads and mailings for the Baraboo School Board candidates by now. Remember last year? Haven't heard a peep from any of them on how they're going to mend fences in the community nor what plans candidates have to change the current misdirection of our school district. (even though the district was the beneficiary of a speaker that cost $6,000)

What I have heard is that the district has mysteriously found over $300,000 (probably from the district enrollment INCREASE we all heard was NOT going to happen because the last two referenda failed). To that end, our school board decided UNANIMOUSLY to spend those funds on six new reading specialists in the elementary schools and one reading specialist in the middle school. What they forgot to mention was that the Baraboo School District is also advertising for one reading specialist at the high school. Where did the money come from for that position? Did the board decide to cut the "Teen Cuisine" or "Horse of Course" classes to pay for it? Other expenditures include a new reading program for $200,000 and a "Community Education Director" position.

Now for some really dumb questions:
  • If we hire all these reading specialists, when their jobs get eliminated because of the declining enrollment we heard so much about a year ago, will the change be portrayed as a cut?
  • Why are teachers not held accountable for the reading skills of the children now? Don't they have an obligation to make sure their students know how to read anymore? Nope. There's no requirement for the teachers to hold kids back if they can't read. They can just pass them to the next grade...Problem solved! (for that teacher) It's tough luck for the student.
  • What are the qualifications for applying for the "Community Education Director" position? Just go to the BSD website. You'll see it doesn't require candidates to be licensed or to even have a high school diploma, let alone any college. If you're good at sucking up to the community and well-connected, then BSD wants you! (Have your friends bring their wallets with them to the interview - you'll do fine.) They need a buffer between their holistic vision and the school haters that want the district to produce unintelligent graduates. They no longer have time to listen to the real world, not that they listened anyway. Our school board has minds to sculpt!

There's discussion of increasing the math and science requirements for high school graduation. At least one person in the community is already upset because the district doesn't have enough science or math teachers to go that direction. Their solution: Hire more math and science teachers - we have a shortage. Buzzzzzz! Wrong answer.

The correct answer needs some background. Over the past several years, the BSD has been hiring "generalist" teachers (my term). They are not expert teachers in science, math, etc. Rather, they know a little about everything and could teach a variety of courses. The district went this direction in their hiring practice because "generalist" teachers are more flexible and can be moved around if needed. You know what's coming next: another dumb question....

Why not have the instructors for Horse of Course, Teen Cuisine, Teen Clothing, and Ceramics 1 & 2 teach math and science courses? You're right. I must keep in mind that it's all about the kids. Far be it for anyone to squelch any opportunity for them to be all they can be.

Could someone please direct me to the college that offers a four-year degree in ceramics? If you can, what is the career outlook and what are the chances they'll return to good ol' Baraboo after college and bring some high paying jobs with them?

4 comments:

Jay P said...

It's nice to know at least one person reads this site. To you, Public School Supporter: While I don't understand why you must make things personal about someone else in all but one of your posts (you'll see that one was posted), I offer the following words of wisdom...

It isn't that I'm for or against public education, it's that I'm for the BEST education for our kids be it public, private, home, distance learning - whatever works the best. What we have now isn't the best. Ask some of your friends who aren't originally from Baraboo. How are the schools from where they hail?

Some have a community agenda of, "Support our EXCELLENT (emphasis mine) K-12 and university systems and boost the quality of our human resources." It sounds like you, Public School Supporter, have been drawn to believe this false premise. Not everyone believes we have an excellent K-12 system. Admit it, it needs a new direction because what's being done now isn't working. Open your mind. There are better ways.

What Baraboo has in 2007 for an educational system is a monopoly with administrative & board visions of grandeur, interventionism, self-esteemism, collaberation, with healthy doses of hallucination and elitism mixed in.

I'll take a leap and guess you've taken a course in economics and learned about monopolies. While they do provide a service, there's no incentive to improve, no accountability, and cost to the consumer is set by the monopoly. Sound familiar?

It didn't used to be this way. The erosion of values in our schools by teachers and administrators doesn't help. This, compounded by board members that want to provide more than the district is financially able to. Thank goodness for spending limits! - see monopoly explained above. The board has been operating under the premise that EVERYTHING is a priority. **Newsflash - Not every service the school district provides kids should be, nor can it be, considered a priority. Our community simply cannot afford it. Let's get the board making REALITY based priorities and decisions.

Instead of being a PUBLIC school supporter, you may consider becoming a BEST school supporter for our kids. You'll be amazed at how many new friends you'll have.

Jay P said...

PSS you bring up a good point when you wrote, "I do want you to know that I am not a Baraboo native. In fact, I graduated from High School on the East Coast. I would have to say my public education experience was head and shoulders above ANYTHING that would ever be possible in Wisconsin today."

I'm very interested now...

If everything was so great then (out East) and Wisconsin currently has the sixth highest spending on K-12 public education in the country, wouldn't you agree it is not unreasonable to have the expectation that kids receive a similar educational experience today?

What is different between the way things were when you were young vs. the way things are today - assuming Wisconsinites believe in funding education with the same fervor (see 6th highest funding in the US) of your home state? Do you think HOW the funds are spent has an impact?

As for your opportunity for an Ivy League education at no personal expense, congratulations. I hope you used the opportunity well. As for Wisconsinites funding college educations, have you any idea how many state tax dollars go to the University of Wisconsin? Not that the UW would be considered "Ivy League", but it isn't Acme College either. So, Wisconsin does support providing high school grads with a college education too. Also, check out your property tax bill and you'll see a special line item for MATC. Wisconsinites support Tech School educational opportunities too.

I'm with you that I'd like to see great educational opportunities for our kids. The funds are there to do it. It's how they're used that's the issue.

Steve Burri said...

At least TWO people read this site!

Jay P said...

Thanks, Steve. It's nice to know an open-minded person with a sense of humor stops here during their internet travels.